On 29 March 2011 17:41, Rodrigo Rivas wrote: > > Maybe a simpler error is better. such as: > "expression is not valid as range in a range-based %<for%> loop > because it lacks begin/end members or begin(int&) and end(int&) > overloads." (I leave the wording to someone more skilled with > English).
If you can prevent the full lookup error and print something different I think users would be very grateful indeed. How about "No suitable %<begin%> and %<end%> functions found for range expression of type %qT in %<for%> statement" ? That
