On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely....@gmail.com> wrote: > Should we consistently refer to %<for%> so the keyword is highlighted? Now that you say... I've not been quite consistent. We could say "range-based %<for%>", with only a dash between 'range' and 'based'.
- Re: [C++0x] Range-based for statements and ADL Rodrigo Rivas
- Re: [C++0x] Range-based for statements and ADL Jonathan Wakely
- Re: [C++0x] Range-based for statements and ADL Rodrigo Rivas
- Re: [C++0x] Range-based for statements and A... Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: [C++0x] Range-based for statements a... Rodrigo Rivas
- Re: [C++0x] Range-based for stateme... Jonathan Wakely
- Re: [C++0x] Range-based for sta... Rodrigo Rivas
- Re: [C++0x] Range-based for... Jonathan Wakely
- Re: [C++0x] Range-based for... Rodrigo Rivas
- Re: [C++0x] Range-based for statements and ADL Jason Merrill
- Re: [C++0x] Range-based for statements and ADL Rodrigo Rivas
- Re: [C++0x] Range-based for statements and A... Jonathan Wakely
- Re: [C++0x] Range-based for statements a... Rodrigo Rivas