On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 4:38 AM, Rodrigo Rivas <rodrigorivasco...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely....@gmail.com> > wrote: >> Should we consistently refer to %<for%> so the keyword is highlighted? > Now that you say... I've not been quite consistent. We could say > "range-based %<for%>", with only a dash between 'range' and 'based'. >
or "new-style for loop"?
