https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115497
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #11) > Although that class template has been there for years, so if any library > like abseil was using the built-in, they're already have the problem that > libstdc++ now has. It looks like the abseil code is not using __is_pointer directly at all, but rather the standard headers here. I suspect we should just rename the __is_pointer template to workaround this clang oddness (and add a comment on why the name is not __is_pointer).
