https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115497
Arthur O'Dwyer <arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot com --- Comment #8 from Arthur O'Dwyer <arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot com> --- FWIW, I also ran into this, this morning. Reduced: https://godbolt.org/z/rxYKTqKd4 Organically in Abseil: https://godbolt.org/z/9eoqKzYjc (This happens because Abseil #includes <algorithm> before <type_traits> (alphabetically). If you switch the order of those two includes, it Just Works.) IMVHO libstdc++ should do jwakely's idea of #include <type_traits> from the offending header file; that's the most foolproof O(1) solution, rather than the O(N) solution of being really careful to always write `bool(__is_foo(T))` instead of `__is_foo(T)`. Also, there are definitely third-party libraries (like Abseil) out there who legitimately want to use `__is_pointer(T)` in their own code, and right now they have no idea that they ought to write all their uses with an extra `bool` cast just to work around a problematic interaction between Clang and libstdc++ (a mode they probably don't even build in their CI). So fixing the problem once and for all on libstdc++'s side of the fence would be really helpful.