https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115497
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Last reconfirmed| |2024-06-14
Status|RESOLVED |NEW
Summary|__is_pointer doesn't |[15 Regression]
|compile with clang since |__is_pointer doesn't
|014879ea4c86b3b8ab6b61a1226 |compile with clang since
|ee5b31e816c8b |014879ea4c86b3b8ab6b61a1226
| |ee5b31e816c8b
Resolution|INVALID |---
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Note I think we should workaround this.
I only posted the clang issue because clang was acting inconsistent in its
handling and should be more consistent in there; not that libstdc++ should not
workaround the issue.