https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115497
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ever confirmed|0 |1 Target Milestone|--- |15.0 Last reconfirmed| |2024-06-14 Status|RESOLVED |NEW Summary|__is_pointer doesn't |[15 Regression] |compile with clang since |__is_pointer doesn't |014879ea4c86b3b8ab6b61a1226 |compile with clang since |ee5b31e816c8b |014879ea4c86b3b8ab6b61a1226 | |ee5b31e816c8b Resolution|INVALID |--- --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Note I think we should workaround this. I only posted the clang issue because clang was acting inconsistent in its handling and should be more consistent in there; not that libstdc++ should not workaround the issue.