https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115497

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
   Target Milestone|---                         |15.0
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2024-06-14
             Status|RESOLVED                    |NEW
            Summary|__is_pointer doesn't        |[15 Regression]
                   |compile with clang since    |__is_pointer doesn't
                   |014879ea4c86b3b8ab6b61a1226 |compile with clang since
                   |ee5b31e816c8b               |014879ea4c86b3b8ab6b61a1226
                   |                            |ee5b31e816c8b
         Resolution|INVALID                     |---

--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Note I think we should workaround this.

I only posted the clang issue because clang was acting inconsistent in its
handling and should be more consistent in there; not that libstdc++ should not
workaround the issue.

Reply via email to