https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94629
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Andrew Stubbs from comment #11) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10) > > or if instead we should drop the "status = " for the cases where nothing > > checks it. Andrew? > > I think checking the status is probably good practice, even though I don't > think there's an actual bug here. I have no way to test it, so if you want and can test it (perhaps with other changes), please take it over, or we throw it away, we don't have to fix all the warnings, we just should skim through it to find if there aren't any actual bugs.
