https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94629
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Stubbs <ams at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10) > or if instead we should drop the "status = " for the cases where nothing > checks it. Andrew? I think checking the status is probably good practice, even though I don't think there's an actual bug here.
