https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94629

--- Comment #11 from Andrew Stubbs <ams at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10)
> or if instead we should drop the "status = " for the cases where nothing
> checks it. Andrew?

I think checking the status is probably good practice, even though I don't
think there's an actual bug here.

Reply via email to