http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58239
--- Comment #7 from Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #4) > > OK, I see the emitted reference to 'operator delete', and I suspect I > > have an idea of why the compiler generated this reference even though > > it isn't used anywhere in the input source code. > > > > Why are we linking gnatlink with xgcc and not with xg++ -nostdc++? > > Because we haven't had a real need up to now, IOW we always managed to > massage things so as to avoid the dependency. Maybe it's the end of the > road... One more thing: Ada was already using -static-libstdc++ to build those tools.
