http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58239
Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2013-08-25
CC| |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> OK, I see the emitted reference to 'operator delete', and I suspect I
> have an idea of why the compiler generated this reference even though
> it isn't used anywhere in the input source code.
>
> Why are we linking gnatlink with xgcc and not with xg++ -nostdc++?
Because we haven't had a real need up to now, IOW we always managed to massage
things so as to avoid the dependency. Maybe it's the end of the road...
