http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49813
--- Comment #43 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-07-26 00:26:26 UTC --- (In reply to comment #42) > Seems like we should add BUILT_IN_ISINF and its variants to > builtin_valid_in_constant_expr_p. Actually, we seem to ignore the arguments when a function satisfies that function, which isn't what we want. Probably morally_constexpr_builtin_function_p should be rewritten to just have an enumeration of suitable builtins, and then move into builtins.c with a different name, right after is_inexpensive_builtin.
