http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49813
--- Comment #35 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2011-07-25 11:41:57 UTC --- Also, something seems wrong with nextafter, but for the intrinsic too this time, thus maybe is a middle-end issue (eg, not optimized at all?). Try: constexpr float na = __builtin_nextafter(0.0f, 0.0f);
