http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49813

--- Comment #34 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2011-07-25 
11:17:24 UTC ---
Better diagnostic would be always welcome, but probably we should deal with
that elsewhere (we *do* have PRs about constexpr vs diagnostics), because it's
a generic problem, isn't specific to the math functions in the library (quite a
special case actually, because C++11 does *not* even mandate those functions to
be constexpr)

Reply via email to