------- Comment #27 from gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu 2008-01-07 06:54 ------- Subject: Re: [4.2/4.3 regression] ICE with incompatible types for ?: with "complex type" conversion
"mark at codesourcery dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | ------- Comment #26 from mark at codesourcery dot com 2008-01-07 01:16 ------- | Subject: Re: [4.2/4.3 regression] ICE with incompatible types | for ?: with "complex type" conversion | | gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu wrote: | | > I would not bet money that nobody is not using it. However, that | > somebody is using something specifically non-standard and NOT | > documented GNU extension. | > | > This situatiation is radically very different from the one where the | > constructor would have been documented as GNU extension | | It isn't different to the user. Surely it is. If it a documented GNU extension, then it is a promise we must keep. If it a standard constructor, then we don't have the choice. -- Gaby -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31780
