------- Comment #18 from pcarlini at suse dot de  2005-11-15 22:00 -------
(In reply to comment #16)
> Here is the current patch so for libstdc++ (I did not test it yet):

Before patching this and that in the runtime library, don't you believe that:
1- If, as Mark said, (__imag__ t) is an lvalue, doesn't make any sense to emit
   warnings at that line?
2- If the user can write that kind of code anyway, the middle end had better
   being able to optimize it?


-- 

pcarlini at suse dot de changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23497

Reply via email to