------- Comment #14 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-15 19:23 ------- There is nothing wrong with the code in Comment #1; __imag__ is an lvalue-yielding operator. If, for some reason, we wanted to make __imag__ yield an rvalue, then this code would be rejected with an error; under no circumstances should it yield a warning about the complex value being uninitialized upon initialization of its imaginary component. It would be reasonable to warn about a subsequent use of the complex value, as the real part remains uninitialized.
Andrew's comments about the fact that __complex__ is a scalar are irrelevant. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23497
