------- Comment #26 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-16 18:40 ------- (In reply to comment #17) > (In reply to comment #13) > > It's nice to see that PR bouncing between you all. Although I don't know > > anything about C++, I want to add my non-constructive comment to this > > discussion: I don't understand how a bug which has a C-only testcase (in > > comment #1) can be classified with libstdc++ as component. Please also note > > that this exact invalid warning happens during the libgfortran build > > process, > > preventing it to be done with -Werror. > > The C example is just as invalid as what libstdc++ does. Now libgfortran must > likely needs to be changed also. >
That is silly. It is a bug elsewhere in the compiler, not in the libraries. You can't properly fix this by requiring all libraries to paper over the issue. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23497
