On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 12:20:14PM +0100, Michael Treibton wrote:
> On 25 August 2014 09:43, Thomas Adam <tho...@fvwm.org> wrote:
> > This conversation is over.
>
> i am biterly concerned and disappointed by this decision - i do not
> understand how you can be closed minded and not take the usefulness of
> asciidoc.
Michael, it's been pointed out to me that my comment was a little
harsh--and I had indeed intended to be, other than a firmer "I've
nothing more I can say that I've not done already". Unlike the
patronising hyperbole I received off-list, I won't patronise you in the
same way, other than to note that I can't add anything more to the
conversation than what I have already.
mdoc seems like the logical choice at the moment, and until such time
that it doesn't provide what we need (assume some further change in
requirements, for example), then we'll look at alternatives. But for
now, I'm very keen to try this and see how it pans out.
-- Thomas Adam
--
"Deep in my heart I wish I was wrong. But deep in my heart I know I am
not." -- Morrissey ("Girl Least Likely To" -- off of Viva Hate.)
