On 24 August 2014 23:10, Dominik Vogt <dominik.v...@gmx.de> wrote: > That example lacks almost all the markup in the text. It does not > allow to automatically generate links in html format, or identify > command names, command options, styles, strings, key sequences > etc. by markup. An Asciidoc source file without all that is > useless.
But asciidoc *can* do that; it's just the example is minimal. > I've spent weeks to add the proper markup to the original fvwm man > pages before they were converted to xml. I won't accept any > documentation format that throws all this extra information away > for no reason. it doesn't throw it, it abstracts it. are you saying you agree with mdoc as a good solution to this then? Michael
