On 15 July 2014 12:04, Chris Bannister <cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 09:04:44AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote: >> On 07/10/14 21:24, Dominik Vogt wrote: >> > >> > Yes, it is confusing, and that's one of the first things I'd clean >> > up if it ever came to fvwm-3.x. Meanwhile, the options are just >> > there for backwards compatibility. However, I've noticed that the >> > old options are still used in the man page. I'll change that in a >> > minute. >> > >> >> fvwm3? Coooool. I am using fvwm since the early beginnings in 1993. > > The key phrase is "*IF* it ever came to". That is how rumours start!
i'd watch mvwm - there's good progress there! and my config file for fvwm still works with it. Michael
