On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 09:04:44AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote: > On 07/10/14 21:24, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > > > Yes, it is confusing, and that's one of the first things I'd clean > > up if it ever came to fvwm-3.x. Meanwhile, the options are just > > there for backwards compatibility. However, I've noticed that the > > old options are still used in the man page. I'll change that in a > > minute. > > > > fvwm3? Coooool. I am using fvwm since the early beginnings in 1993.
The key phrase is "*IF* it ever came to". That is how rumours start! -- "If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing." --- Malcolm X
