On 07/10/14 21:24, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > Yes, it is confusing, and that's one of the first things I'd clean > up if it ever came to fvwm-3.x. Meanwhile, the options are just > there for backwards compatibility. However, I've noticed that the > old options are still used in the man page. I'll change that in a > minute. >
fvwm3? Coooool. I am using fvwm since the early beginnings in 1993. Regards Harri
