Harry portobello wrote:
[snip]
Harry:
when I read your first posting, I thought you were kidding around; I
admit I didn't read it to the end.
But now I am baffled: you seem to want to create a problem that does not
exist.
The replies you got on this list indicate that there is no issue with
Thomas. If there is someone on this
list that has an issue, speak up.
I'm quite surprised by the amount of "support" received here for
Thomas; it contradicts what I've been told which makes me wonder who
is "right", but clearly there's still a problem here regardless of
that, and I'm not wanting to staet a tug-o-war.
You don't have to put the word support in quotes, I'm sure that it is
real, accept it.
I've had minimal input to this list, but I've been a subscriber for a
very, very long time, and follow it daily. Thomas' "abrasiveness" is
rare and pretty mild when it does show; I have read posts where the
poster is being an as**ole, yet Thomas continues to help the guy out.
The inconvenient side of the internet is you can't get to see people
you're dealing with, so I'm having difficulty figuring you out but if
you are sincere with this issue, then open your eyes and realize that
Thomas is a nice guy without whom we would have no fvwm, and
overwhelmingly no one has a problem with him.
