--- seventh guardian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :

> On 7/15/05, Nick Fortune <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I challenge you to do "ls ~ -la". I bet you would be lost. Having
> a
> > > program configuration dir would help to sort things out, and
> would
> > > benefit every one.
> > 
> > Done that. Not Lost.
> > 
> > What was your point?
> > 
> > 
> 
> My point is that there are TONS of configuration dirs in your home
> dir, mixed with data/docs dirs, and unsorted files. And even though
> the configs are usually hidden, they should be inside one main hidden
> dir, instead of just being clogging your home dir.
> 

You can always write your own OS to fit our needs.
You see, ls does not display all files by default because you don't
want 
to see everyday your configuration files.

> For instance, if you try to find the config dir for that particular
> program, and you don't know its name, then doing ls -la is useless,
> because (at least in my case) the terminal buffer overflows, so you
> can't see the first dirs that show up. Unless you pipe it to less,
> but
> then you loose the colour formating.. Making it a separate dir would
> allow you to have only config dirs showing, and not your docs or data
> dirs.
> 
>

Usually one of the first command a user learns, when he encounters a
UNIX 
or unix like system, is man. Unfortunately, sometimes, the first
command a user learns on a *NIX system is click. 

If you use man to display the manual page for your terminal you will
see that 
xterm has an option "-sl". This option tells xterm how many lines to
save in his buffer. Other terminal emulators have a similar option or
you can use their menu to change the number of lines they keep in the
buffer. 



        

        
                
___________________________________________________________________________ 
Appel audio GRATUIT partout dans le monde avec le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger 
Téléchargez cette version sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com

Reply via email to