On 8/7/24 9:43 AM, glen wrote:
Why? Why would you burn that energy to perform such a task?

   <snark> because as with all technology for all of time,

       "because we can"

   </snark>

   I agree/realize that in our rush to embrace "the next cool thing" it
   is easy to get carried away... like with the (relative) excesses of
   Car Races and Barnstorming at the dawn of personal transportation.

   I feel my own self-dissatisfaction with the seduction I feel for
   chatting with GPT as a "bar friend" as much as I do... a *real* bar
   friend would only consume order 100W at most to bend his/her brain
   around my nonsensical suppositions and investigations... I doubt GPT
   is so efficient.  Also, if the brew we are quaffing is of local
   production, a lot of the energy we are processing from gut-biome to
   glucose/blood-alcohol into our brains (and stool-sat butt-flexors)
   came directly from the sunlight falling near by on fields of grain
   and hops.

Specifically to Stephen's particular application du jour, I share a certain fascination with the way GPT/LLMs can so adeptly expand the dimensionality of my maunderings for/with me.  I don't always believe it does it in what I would call responsible or even useful-to-me space, but it does allow/suggest some opening up of my parallaxical aperture (as does most any conversation with you, Glen... ) but you are more the 100W version with a specific unique perspective vs the order(s)of magnitude higher energy abuse version of GPT.

Compared to the Million or so miles I drove in cars, trucks, motorcycles, airplanes in my life "just because I could" in my life, I think my LLM indulgences are still somewhat small, but do threaten to overtake quietly... just as standing by a gas-pump to fill a 20gallon tank with $20 gallons of petrol (and a $1 quart of motor oil and some free air in my leaky tires) to then drive across the state, as a young adult felt like effing magic, so does casually asking GPT every inane question I can think of for $20/month (or free if I prefer)...    I should definitely wire in my GPT usage to a rowing machine and only allow myself to ask as many questions (or carry on as many discussions) as my own energy input into the grid (or noosphere) would allow if there were an actual connection.

I think I'll ask an LLM the best way to go about that, and get back to you!

- Steve


On 8/6/24 18:05, Stephen Guerin wrote:
Glen writes:
 >We had identities like "head" (kid who does lots of drugs), "jock" (kids who spent lots of time in organized athletics), "brain" (kids who spent time doing chess, math, ...), etc. There was also a name for the [metal|wood|…] shop kids. But I've forgotten it.

Ala the ElfSelector and Consciousness Table, I asked GPT to generate 30 highschool social groups  from the 80, 3 orthogonal vectors with semantic meaning to separate them and 3 questions to ask you to put you in the space. https://guerin.acequia.io/identityTensor.html <https://guerin.acequia.io/identityTensor.html>

literally 40 seconds from prompt to deployed page :-)

On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 8:30 AM glen <geprope...@gmail.com <mailto:geprope...@gmail.com>> wrote:

    I'm in an ongoing argument with some of my salon goers about identity. People seem to straddle its multiple meanings for rhetorical (or confirmation biasing) purposes, fluidly switching one context/meaning for another so often and so fluidly as to prevent me from understanding whatever it is they're saying (or trying to avoid saying).

    Introspection is rife with such problems, including a six year old coming to some self-identification/registration as a member of some crisp class/category. The most recent Bad Faith rhetoric about identity had to do with "neurodivergent". There seems to be a trend amongst "the kids these days" to identify as autistic or ADHD. I mean, I was clearly "different" when I was a kid. We had identities like "head" (kid who does lots of drugs), "jock" (kids who spent lots of time in organized athletics), "brain" (kids who spent time doing chess, math, ...), etc. There was also a name for the [metal|wood|…] shop kids. But I've forgotten it.

    Some of us were diagnosed with various labels including some words we're not supposed to say anymore. Many of my friends had such conditions. But none of us *identified* as those diagnoses. The diagnoses seemed almost orthogonal to the identities/tribes. (I happened to be a member of the heads, jocks, brains, and "band nerd" tribes; that multi-tribe crossover was part of what made me feel "different".) And each group had its share of the same diagnoses.

    It seems to me that our tech-associated, individualistic, isolation has driven "the kids" to over-emphasize their diagnoses, to adopt them as identities/tribes, identifying from the inside->out; whereas we (can't speak for anyone else, really) mostly identified from the outside->in. We were sorted by society. The kids these days seem more self-sorted. On the one hand, that could feel like increased liberty and free association. But on the other hand, it's like everyone is a home-schooled weirdo these days and nobody knows how to, for example, bite their tongue or avoid picking their nose in public.

    Not everybody needs to be a Hunter S Thompson, "neurodivergent", or whatever. Some of us should be allowed to identify as "normal". Introspection is a sickness.

    On 8/5/24 17:01, steve smith wrote:
     > I jumped straight to the Artistic meaning of /frottage/ as coined originally by Max Ernst and while not as an act of psychopathy, it does have strong implications for the psychological/subconscious implications in this context?
     >
     > In any case, I find it a compelling opening line of the /call me Ishmael/ caliber.
     >
     > On 8/5/24 10:04 AM, Prof David West wrote:
     >> This is very interesting, and timely. I am completing an autobiography/essay/monograph for which this will be quite relevant. The opening lines of the work:
     >>
     >> /"An act of frottage triggered the self-recognition that I was a psychopath. I did not, of course, know either term or their meanings./
     >> /
     >> /
     >> /I was six." /
     >>
     >> davew
     >>
     >> On Thu, Aug 1, 2024, at 11:03 AM, glen wrote:
     >> > Progress or Pathology? Differential Diagnosis and Intervention Criteria
     >> > for Meditation-Related Challenges: Perspectives From Buddhist
     >> > Meditation Teachers and Practitioners
     >> > https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7403193/ <https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7403193/>
     >> >
     >> > Based on our conversation attempting to identify behavioral markers for      >> > consciousness, I thought this paper might give some insight into Dave's      >> > straddling of mystical and materialistic descriptions of experiences he      >> > marks as conscious. In the paper, they lay out 11 levers for making the
     >> > distinction:
     >> >
     >> > • Circumstances of Onset
     >> > • Control
     >> > • Critical Attitude
     >> > • Cultural Compatibility
     >> > • Distress
     >> > • Duration
     >> > • Functional Impairment
     >> > • Health History or Condition
     >> > • Impact
     >> > • Phenomenological Qualities
     >> > • Teachers’ Skills or Resources
     >> >
     >> >  From my perspective that consciousness is a kind of fusion function,      >> > Control, Critical Attitude, Distress, and Functional Impairment are      >> > primary and the rest are secondary. The ability to (change one's) focus      >> > of attention is a hallmark of consciousness, and those 4 levers      >> > direclty target one's ability to focus. Duration may well be secondary      >> > and the rest tertiary, I guess. Because there's something like a      >> > half-life of controllability. If, say, you're a conspiracy theorist,      >> > and you *entertain*, say, flat earth for long enough, maybe you'll lack      >> > the ability to re-focus and don a critical attitude. Similarly, if you      >> > embed into, say, procedural programming long enough, maybe you'll lose      >> > the ability to re-focus and think functionally ... a kind of Functional
     >> > Impairment (sorry for the polysemy of "functional", there).
     >> >

-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Reply via email to