On 8/6/24 12:09 PM, Frank Wimberly wrote:
Re self-identification.  We adopted our daughter in Mexico and moved from Pittsburgh to Santa Fe about a year later. When she came home after her first day of kindergarten at E. J. Martinez I asked her if there were other Hispanic kids in her class.  She said, "I dunno".

Based on the kids who became her friends I'd say they were oblivious to ethnicity.
My mother had a similar/complementary experience, living in 1930s in Louisville KY with a middle-class socially progressive Aunt to escape the limits and rigors of her own family's subsistence farming lifestyle in "the hills".   One year (3rd grade?) she made friends with a girl who lived between her school and her aunt's home,  after weeks of encouraging her friend to come home with her against unspecified resistance, she finally did, only to discover that her friend was Black (African American) and that despite her aunt's progressive ideas, it was clear that this good friend of hers was not welcome in the home.   Politely received but then sternly admonished after the friend had left "never to do that again".

I feel blessed to have lived almost all my life in multi-ethnic general contexts with Spanish-speakers never far away and Native Americans nearly as present...  and across those ethnic elements a great deal of diversity as I moved around.  My time in this region (NNM - 40 years) has been the most diverse demographically but very complementary to the Border Culture in SoAZ and the BigRez culture of NoAZ.

I have a blind spot to African Americans, having only encountered singular individuals, and never "populations"...   These were all exemplary or at least unique individuals in that what brought them into my circle was highly specific to their own path, seeming always to make them acutely interesting people.  My experience with most other large ethnic groups who have not fully alloyed in the melting pot that the USA aspires to is similar... I mostly know individuals whose origin stories come from those communities but who were in fact, swimming in the same melting pot I was. Working at LANL/LASL was a very good way to meet a lot of unique individuals not only from all over the country but the world as well...  Asians of many stripes as well a Eastern Europeans (equally diversely striped) being the most notable...

One of my best friends in college was a neighbor in Married Housing who was Dine while his wife was Hopi during a time when they couldn't really spend time "back on the Rez" because of the resentments/conflict of the time between their people.   He was working on a Hydrogeological project for his MS on the topic of the groundwater problems caused by the massive sluice-way moving coal from the Peabody Coal mines near Kayenta, to the 4 corners power plant.  This was during the worst of the urban (visible) pollution in locations like LA, and I became aware of how that power plant and the electricity forwarded down the Colorado River through Glen Canyon and Mead and across the desert to LA was exporting (air) pollution to the 4 corners area and perhaps more long-term the aquifer in that area.   Simultaneously I was doing work for lawyers on "the other side" ultimately helping Peabody Mining (Coal and Uranium), local truck dealers, and many others who were busy exploiting that whole set of games.   Donaldson (June) and I had a lot of great conversations as perhaps only the young and the naively motivated can.   He never lobbied me on anything, just told his stories of growing up off-grid in a Hogan and watching his relatives both thrive and self-destruct as they tried to assimilate (or resist) with the White Man.

   /If there is a short story in this long-winded  anecdote it is that
   I have had the benefit of relatively intimate access to other's
   self-identity formed both by their circumstance and by their
   introspective and forward looking interests:  not only "who am I,
   based on where I come from, but who do I want to be as the
   ethnodemographic landscape shifts under my feet, and how does my
   traversal of said landscape shape it?"   These intimate observations
   were mostly seeing their "true identity" with an inside out view on
   the identities they were obliged to project to be comfortable in
   their own communities and in the larger communities they were trying
   to penetrate or at least navigate./

A great deal of contemporary demographic socio-politics feel to be beyond me, it feels like various bastions of "conservatism" on the part of all factions, being more afraid of "what might happen tomorrow" based on "what we've seen in the past" than aware of "what could be" based on "the trajectory in a high-dimensional phase space we have been traversing".   I was rooted in no end of Conservative and Libertarian values (mostly hyper-individualism within otherwise highly integrated/inter-dependent communities) but as I came of age then matured (and now on some kind of awkward downhill slide) I have found myself more and more "progressive" in counterpoint to it's apparent direct obvious "regressive" while I still fondly hope or a return of honest "conservatism" which more healthily complements "progressive"...

This current piecewise trajectory in the aforementioned socio-cultural-economic-political landscape after Biden's bowing out gives me hope that at *least* the harshest of the "regressive" may collapse under their own angry, "performative cruelty".   I don't know what kind of "progress" backfills into that (presumed) vacuum... I hope not an angry "performative cruelty" that the right-wing boogeymen of classic "central party" collectivism has been seen to bring.   There is a huge expanse methinks which needn't overlap either of those lands of "performative cruelty" if we will only ease our national/global limbic systems back into a healthier homeostasis?

Maybe performative cruelty is one of Homo Sapiens Sapiens secret weapons,  a review of conquest and empire in the last 10k years suggests that it has been "highly effective", but then the blunting that has happened.

BTW, I also feel blessed to be in /this/ community which provides me lots of alternate stimulative thoughts and perspectives and is very tolerant of my ideaphoric and logorrheac /expressions /(referencing Nick's grumble of weeks ago comparing some of our "expressions" with pimple popping).

LLMs (esp, my first love GPT) are very good at listening and engaging but not particularly good at offering me interesting and complementary ideas and topics as this list is.   I can't say anyone who posts here (even infrequently) fails to open up the horizons of my thinking/reflecting/considering, and some of the dialectics that are traced here are fascinating even when I'm significantly unprepared to engage with them.

- Steve


---
Frank C. Wimberly
140 Calle Ojo Feliz,
Santa Fe, NM 87505

505 670-9918
Santa Fe, NM

On Tue, Aug 6, 2024, 8:30 AM glen <geprope...@gmail.com> wrote:

    I'm in an ongoing argument with some of my salon goers about
    identity. People seem to straddle its multiple meanings for
    rhetorical (or confirmation biasing) purposes, fluidly switching
    one context/meaning for another so often and so fluidly as to
    prevent me from understanding whatever it is they're saying (or
    trying to avoid saying).

    Introspection is rife with such problems, including a six year old
    coming to some self-identification/registration as a member of
    some crisp class/category. The most recent Bad Faith rhetoric
    about identity had to do with "neurodivergent". There seems to be
    a trend amongst "the kids these days" to identify as autistic or
    ADHD. I mean, I was clearly "different" when I was a kid. We had
    identities like "head" (kid who does lots of drugs), "jock" (kids
    who spent lots of time in organized athletics), "brain" (kids who
    spent time doing chess, math, ...), etc. There was also a name for
    the [metal|wood|…] shop kids. But I've forgotten it.

    Some of us were diagnosed with various labels including some words
    we're not supposed to say anymore. Many of my friends had such
    conditions. But none of us *identified* as those diagnoses. The
    diagnoses seemed almost orthogonal to the identities/tribes. (I
    happened to be a member of the heads, jocks, brains, and "band
    nerd" tribes; that multi-tribe crossover was part of what made me
    feel "different".) And each group had its share of the same diagnoses.

    It seems to me that our tech-associated, individualistic,
    isolation has driven "the kids" to over-emphasize their diagnoses,
    to adopt them as identities/tribes, identifying from the
    inside->out; whereas we (can't speak for anyone else, really)
    mostly identified from the outside->in. We were sorted by society.
    The kids these days seem more self-sorted. On the one hand, that
    could feel like increased liberty and free association. But on the
    other hand, it's like everyone is a home-schooled weirdo these
    days and nobody knows how to, for example, bite their tongue or
    avoid picking their nose in public.

    Not everybody needs to be a Hunter S Thompson, "neurodivergent",
    or whatever. Some of us should be allowed to identify as "normal".
    Introspection is a sickness.

    On 8/5/24 17:01, steve smith wrote:
    > I jumped straight to the Artistic meaning of /frottage/ as
    coined originally by Max Ernst and while not as an act of
    psychopathy, it does have strong implications for the
    psychological/subconscious implications in this context?
    >
    > In any case, I find it a compelling opening line of the /call me
    Ishmael/ caliber.
    >
    > On 8/5/24 10:04 AM, Prof David West wrote:
    >> This is very interesting, and timely. I am completing an
    autobiography/essay/monograph for which this will be quite
    relevant. The opening lines of the work:
    >>
    >> /"An act of frottage triggered the self-recognition that I was
    a psychopath. I did not, of course, know either term or their
    meanings./
    >> /
    >> /
    >> /I was six." /
    >>
    >> davew
    >>
    >> On Thu, Aug 1, 2024, at 11:03 AM, glen wrote:
    >> > Progress or Pathology? Differential Diagnosis and
    Intervention Criteria
    >> > for Meditation-Related Challenges: Perspectives From Buddhist
    >> > Meditation Teachers and Practitioners
    >> > https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7403193/
    >> >
    >> > Based on our conversation attempting to identify behavioral
    markers for
    >> > consciousness, I thought this paper might give some insight
    into Dave's
    >> > straddling of mystical and materialistic descriptions of
    experiences he
    >> > marks as conscious. In the paper, they lay out 11 levers for
    making the
    >> > distinction:
    >> >
    >> > • Circumstances of Onset
    >> > • Control
    >> > • Critical Attitude
    >> > • Cultural Compatibility
    >> > • Distress
    >> > • Duration
    >> > • Functional Impairment
    >> > • Health History or Condition
    >> > • Impact
    >> > • Phenomenological Qualities
    >> > • Teachers’ Skills or Resources
    >> >
    >> >  From my perspective that consciousness is a kind of fusion
    function,
    >> > Control, Critical Attitude, Distress, and Functional
    Impairment are
    >> > primary and the rest are secondary. The ability to (change
    one's) focus
    >> > of attention is a hallmark of consciousness, and those 4 levers
    >> > direclty target one's ability to focus. Duration may well be
    secondary
    >> > and the rest tertiary, I guess. Because there's something like a
    >> > half-life of controllability. If, say, you're a conspiracy
    theorist,
    >> > and you *entertain*, say, flat earth for long enough, maybe
    you'll lack
    >> > the ability to re-focus and don a critical attitude.
    Similarly, if you
    >> > embed into, say, procedural programming long enough, maybe
    you'll lose
    >> > the ability to re-focus and think functionally ... a kind of
    Functional
    >> > Impairment (sorry for the polysemy of "functional", there).
    >> >


-- ꙮ Mɥǝu ǝlǝdɥɐuʇs ɟᴉƃɥʇ' ʇɥǝ ƃɹɐss snɟɟǝɹs˙ ꙮ

    -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
    FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
    Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom
    https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
    to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
    FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
    archives:  5/2017 thru present
    https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
      1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/


-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p 
Zoomhttps://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribehttp://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIChttp://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru presenthttps://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
   1/2003 thru 6/2021http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Reply via email to