Well, it seems obvious to me (admittedly at risk of imputation or 
Dunning-Kruger) that we all have both modes in our repertoire. Maybe there are 
subsets of us who lean hard one way or the other. But I guess that just kicks 
the can down the road. Too much soldier ⇒ not recognizing when to switch to 
scout mode. And vice versa, like those pitiful truth-s[uc|ee]kers stuck in a 
conversation with a zero-sum logicbro.

It's error-correcting self-attention loops all the way down ... and up. And if 
you're not exercising your  low/fast interrupts (capsaicin , yoga, LSD, 
whatever), then you're probably not exercising your high/slow interrupts 
(active listening, abandoning pet theories, etc.). The idea that we can 
strengthen the high/slow interrupts without also strengthening the low/fast 
ones seems fideistic to me ... like telekinesis or somesuch.

Tangentially, I'm somewhat of a fan of Goertzel. But this worries me:

Evidence for Psi: Thirteen Empirical Research Reports
https://bookshop.org/books/evidence-for-psi-thirteen-empirical-research-reports/9780786478286

Maybe one of you has read it? I'm told it contains some fantastic nuggets about 
statistics, which makes me want a copy. And this video presents a good 
argument, regardless of the gist:

How I learned to love pseudoscience
https://youtu.be/bWV0XIn-rvY

But I worry about my own ability to switch from scout to soldier ... which is 
why the right-wing morons I talk to at the pub don't immediately murder me. 
Once they get to know me, they don't love me anymore.

On 10/14/21 3:29 PM, Marcus Daniels wrote:
> Even with a scout mentality there is the problem of modeling the deck of 
> alternative scenarios that arise from uncertainty in a map.    The tendency 
> to take imputed values for a set of unknown variables is a practical 
> cognitive resource limitation that one can acknowledge or fail to 
> acknowledge.    To challenge a person’s gut feeling -- all those imputed 
> values -- and to observe the exasperation (even perceived persecution) that 
> may result from the challenge is how I distinguish scouts from soldiers.   
> There are surely some tactical benefits to soldiers running toward the enemy 
> with their bayonets to not spend a lot of time reflecting on how confident 
> they are that the person they are running toward is their enemy.
> 
> From: Friam <friam-boun...@redfish.com> On Behalf Of Jon Zingale
> Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2021 1:17 PM
> To: friam@redfish.com
> Subject: Re: [FRIAM] [dis]integrated
> 
> 
> The Scout Mindset
> 
> https://bookshop.org/books/the-scout-mindset-why-some-people-see-things-clearly-and-others-don-t/9780735217553


-- 
"Better to be slapped with the truth than kissed with a lie."
☤>$ uǝlƃ


.-- .- -. - / .- -.-. - .. --- -. ..--.. / -.-. --- -. .--- ..- --. .- - .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn UTC-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:
 5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
 1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Reply via email to