Well, the reason I'm throwing this idea out there in the first place is because
parts of it map (roughly) to LOTS of algorithms I've run across over the years.
Nick was asking and I'm simply trying to spitball something that might be
constructive. You're free to analogize to your heart's content. 8^D If Nick
tries to write a paper with something like this in it, HE would have to do a
LOT of literature searching to trace each element.
On 6/16/20 1:17 PM, Frank Wimberly wrote:
I've only read your first paragraph but isn't that exactly what Samuel's
checker program did by revising regression coefficients as it gained
experience. We're talking late 1960s.
- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
