Mu is an unspecified function parameterized by everything and that returns a 
distribution.   Not as convenient to put into a table as "NA"!

On 5/14/20, 8:30 AM, "Friam on behalf of Steven A Smith" 
<friam-boun...@redfish.com on behalf of sasm...@swcp.com> wrote:

    I just read Pirsig's (in "Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance"
    reflections on the Japanese concept of "Mu" and thought of at least a
    half-dozen of our threads here...  
    
    https://www.awakin.org/read/view.php?tid=583
    
    I'm wondering if Carl (Tollander) is listening here and might offer his
    own perspective (as a Japanophile and practicioner on this edge IMO)
    
    - Steve
    
    
    .-. .- -. -.. --- -- -..-. -.. --- - ... -..-. .- -. -.. -..-. -.. .- ... 
.... . ...
    FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
    Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
    unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
    archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
    FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ 
    

.-. .- -. -.. --- -- -..-. -.. --- - ... -..-. .- -. -.. -..-. -.. .- ... .... 
. ...
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ 

Reply via email to