Has anybody written for us defrocked English majors an account of the evolution 
of software.    It must be subject to the same klugy processes that organismic 
evolution is but it also must be different because, with software evolution you 
can, SOMETIMES, go back to the beginning and start again.  Wildly Naïve 
Question:  If one “sequenced” today’s Windows, how many DOS “genes” would one 
find?  I note, for instance, that still, after 30 years, in order to identify 
New Mexico as one’s state, to most websites, one still has to scroll down a 
list of states, and last week, I ran into a list of countries in which US was 
not the first item.  Just like the good old days.  I assume that developers 
just keep taking that old piece of crap off the shelf and sticking it into 
their programs.  

 

Nick 

 

Nicholas Thompson

Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology

Clark University

 <mailto:thompnicks...@gmail.com> thompnicks...@gmail.com

 <https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/> 
https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/

 

 

From: Friam <friam-boun...@redfish.com> On Behalf Of Frank Wimberly
Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2019 8:44 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <friam@redfish.com>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] IT is Not Sustainable

 


June 2019) (Learn how and when to remove this template message). 5ESS used in a 
mobile telephone network. The 5ESS Switching System is a Class 5 telephone 
electronic switching system developed by ...

-----------------------------------
Frank Wimberly

My memoir:
https://www.amazon.com/author/frankwimberly

My scientific publications:
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Frank_Wimberly2

Phone (505) 670-9918

 

On Thu, Dec 26, 2019, 8:36 AM Marcus Daniels <mar...@snoutfarm.com 
<mailto:mar...@snoutfarm.com> > wrote:

Frank writes:

 

“This was the telephone network in question.“

 

With the mobile carriers and VOIP, I wonder how much of that code is still 
used?  I once worked for a small company that wrote software to do billing for 
long distance telephone carriers.  I was amazed by the seemingly arbitrary 
complexity.   Complex at a policy and inter-organizational level, not just the 
software.

 

Marcus

 

From: Friam <friam-boun...@redfish.com <mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com> > on 
behalf of Frank Wimberly <wimber...@gmail.com <mailto:wimber...@gmail.com> >
Reply-To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <friam@redfish.com 
<mailto:friam@redfish.com> >
Date: Thursday, December 26, 2019 at 5:39 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <friam@redfish.com 
<mailto:friam@redfish.com> >
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] IT is Not Sustainable

 

At Bell Labs we sure didn't pay anyone by LOC.  We also had code reviews and 
software tools to enforce standards and very high pay.  With a brand new PhD I 
made more than all but the 3 most senior members of the CS faculty at Pitt 
where I was a grad student.  This was the telephone network in question. 

 

Despite the high pay I disliked software administration methodology.  The 
disagreements between the software tool developers (version control, 
integration of subsystems, compilers, etc) and the implementors of the 
applications, such as call processing, were epic.  Recall that Bell Labs 
invented C and Unix.  After 18 months I returned to Pittsburgh to work at 
Carnegie Mellon in Robotics for two thirds the salary.

 

Number 5 ESS was first deployed in March 1982, 4 years after work began.  I 
suspect that it didn't have 200 million lines of code then, but close to it.  
Maybe Dave doesn't consider it an IT project but many of the software tools 
that were developed were included in later Unix releases, I believe.

 

It's going to be a beautiful day in Santa Fe.

 

Frank

 

 

-----------------------------------
Frank Wimberly

My memoir:
https://www.amazon.com/author/frankwimberly

My scientific publications:
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Frank_Wimberly2

Phone (505) 670-9918

 

On Thu, Dec 26, 2019, 1:28 AM Gary Schiltz <g...@naturesvisualarts.com 
<mailto:g...@naturesvisualarts.com> > wrote:

Spot on. 

 

On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 2:29 AM Marcus Daniels <mar...@snoutfarm.com 
<mailto:mar...@snoutfarm.com> > wrote:

Most programmers won't struggle to rationalize or improve code written by other 
people.    The problem is that people are selfish.  They think that their 10K 
LOC problem is beautiful and nimble, but that 1M LOC was once that too.    It's 
the behavior of teenagers.

On 12/25/19, 10:47 PM, "Friam on behalf of Russell Standish" 
<friam-boun...@redfish.com <mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com>  on behalf of 
li...@hpcoders.com.au <mailto:li...@hpcoders.com.au> > wrote:

    It's all about the LOC! Actually, I kind of agree - having worked on
    some MegaLOC codebases that functionally seemed to be no more complex
    than a 10KLOC project I'm involved in, the 10KLOC project is much more
    nimble - compile times are far less, making changes to the code easier
    and bugs less troublesome to winkle out.

    I've also refactored or rewritten pieces of code to slash the LOC by a
    factor of 3 or more for that particular section (eg 3KLOC -> 1KLOC) -
    but usually when bugs and problems kept on cropping up in that
    section.

    Even though the LOC is an entirely bogus measurement - if you paid a
    programmer by LOC, you'd get boilerplate and crappy comments.

    -- 

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Dr Russell Standish                    Phone 0425 253119 (mobile)
    Principal, High Performance Coders
    Visiting Senior Research Fellow        hpco...@hpcoders.com.au 
<mailto:hpco...@hpcoders.com.au> 
    Economics, Kingston University         http://www.hpcoders.com.au
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

    ============================================================
    FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
    Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
    to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
    archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
    FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ 
<http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/FRIAM-COMIC> 
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

Reply via email to