Taxes bypassed? Probably not so. See
https://www.abqjournal.com/962831/amazon-to-start-collecting-taxes-in-new-mexico.html
Robert C
On 5/7/17 10:49 AM, Marcus Daniels wrote:
With Amazon Prime, this is all irrelevant. Click and ship what you
want and such taxes will be bypassed. Further, Amazon’s distribution
costs will be lower than going through a local distributor anyway.
Stupid to build a tax base on an business model that is obsolete.
*From:*Friam [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] *On Behalf Of *Owen
Densmore
*Sent:* Sunday, May 07, 2017 10:37 AM
*To:* The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
<friam@redfish.com>
*Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] Whew!
Ya gotta love the City Different:
Inline image 1
The small print:
Inline image 2
On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 11:37 AM, Robert J. Cordingley
<rob...@cirrillian.com <mailto:rob...@cirrillian.com>> wrote:
Let me throw some things into this mix
Some estimates (SFNewMexican
<http://www.santafenewmexican.com/news/local_news/voters-smack-down-mayor-s-beverage-tax-proposal/article_3971faf0-2f9c-11e7-8374-532a52cd354f.html>)
suggest in total over $3.12 million was spent by both sides on the
campaign while the expected cost of the Pre-K to be funded was
$7.7million in the first year. Subsequent years ought to be less
because facilities would already be in place.
Some roughly 800 Pre-Ks (4 yr olds) would be included. That's
~$9,000/yr per child which sounds like a good deal based on
Frank's numbers. Pre-K <> child-care btw. Some 160
teachers+assistants+extended care providers would be needed to run
a 5 day program for 40 classes of 20 students each (2
teachers/class + 2 for extended day care).
The Santa Fe Public Schools are expected to expand their free (to
parents) Pre-K programs
<http://www.sfps.info/cms/One.aspx?portalId=115105&pageId=150523>
subject to legislative funding but I don't know details of when,
probably never 'cos NM State budget is at an impasse.
A possible but unconfirmed motivation for the Mayor's proposal was
to get to a point where Pre-K would be indispensable and thus get
sustainable funding and not have to depend on hopefully declining
soda tax revenues.
According to the New Mexican again
<http://www.santafenewmexican.com/news/local_news/half-truths-falsehoods-create-confusion-in-soda-tax-fight/article_68ac5a30-7159-5a1d-913a-a625dfa36e8d.html>,
lemonade powder would be taxed on the made up quantity changing
the price from something like $7/can to $28/can - bad 'optics'.
Some claimed tourists might be big contributors to the soda-tax
revenues anyway.
Some people suggested they would buy sugary drinks in order to
support Pre-K.
Others suggested the beverage industry ('Big Soda') could not
stand the idea that the soda-tax would be a seen as sin-tax and
are trying desperately not to get it labelled as such.
No-one on the for side in the campaign I saw made any suggestions
on what folks should switch to to avoid the tax, e.g. flavored
water, water, plain teas and coffees. The last being more
profitable for businesses.
Based on district voting the people most likely to benefit health
wise voted against it. Sound familiar?
It's claimed the for side didn't play up the health benefits
enough in their campaign and that Big Soda came over as the local
group while the the for side came over as elitist and out of state.
If passed, lookout for Soda stands outside the city limits.
So it all looks a little silly. I support both ideas tho' living
in the county I couldn't vote.
The questions remain: how to fund Pre-K and how to cut consumption
of unhealthy sugary drinks? The against side said it should be
funded from the 'surplus' the city has but there are legal
restrictions on those funds apparently. The city has it's own
component of Gross Receipts Tax (which is like a Sales Tax but
applied more broadly).
So what's the real problem and how do we fix it? The mayor is
still looking for good ideas.
Robert C
On 5/3/17 9:43 PM, Marcus Daniels wrote:
< $13-16k per year is a huge number. Does this include "child
care" .. i.e. taking care of the child for working parents?
That is a lot more expensive than "pre-school".>
Doggy day care is about half that. If a dog has the
intelligence of a 2 year old, and pre-K child is 4, then a
linear extrapolation to an 18 year freshman’s day care
(tuition) is about $63k a year. Must be the complexity of the
control system that is required!
Marcus
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribehttp://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIChttp://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
--
Cirrillian
Web Design & Development
Santa Fe, NM
http://cirrillian.com
281-989-6272 <tel:%28281%29%20989-6272> (cell)
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe
http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
<http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com>
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
--
Cirrillian
Web Design & Development
Santa Fe, NM
http://cirrillian.com
281-989-6272 (cell)
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
