External Email - Use Caution
Many thanks for reaching out and providing such clear information, Douglas
and Bruce! I really appreciate it.
I was indeed comparing the ?h.aparc.annot files produced by recon-all to
those produced by mri_surf2surf.
The aim of my analyses is to compare groups in morphometric features, using
parcellations initially generated in fsaverage and then resampled to each
subject's native surface. Based on the information you provided, it sounds
like my approach is valid as long as I consistently use the mri_surf2surf
command with identical arguments for all subjects within each group. Is
that correct?
Thanks again for your time and attention!
Best,
Leo
Em dom., 10 de set. de 2023 às 14:19, Fischl, Bruce R.,PHD <
bfis...@mgh.harvard.edu> escreveu:
> External Email - Use Caution
>
> Actually there is a whole Bayesian segmentation on the surface procedure
> that generates the individual subject parcellation so it definitely won’t
> be the same as just mapping fsaverage
>
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Bruce
>
>
>
> *From:* freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <
> freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> *On Behalf Of *Douglas N. Greve
> *Sent:* Sunday, September 10, 2023 1:35 PM
> *To:* freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> *Subject:* Re: [Freesurfer] Discrepancy in vertex counts between
> resampled and recon-all generated annot files
>
>
>
> * External Email - Use Caution *
>
> Which annot files are you comparing? Some of them (eg, aparc) have an
> extra procedure where the labels boundaries are fine-tuned, so that could
> cause the difference. Your command looks right.
>
> On 8/30/2023 1:28 PM, Leonardo Cardoso Saraiva wrote:
>
> * External Email - Use Caution *
>
> Dear Freesurfer Experts,
>
> I would like to follow up on my last email and ask if you had a chance to
> take a look at it.
>
> Any guidance or feedback would be greatly appreciated!
>
> Thank you for your time!
>
> Best,
> Leo
>
>
>
> Em dom., 20 de ago. de 2023 às 23:41, Leonardo Cardoso Saraiva <
> leonardo.sara...@usp.br> escreveu:
>
> Dear Freesurfer Experts,
>
> I am using .annot files to extract parcellated vertex-wise morphometric
> features from surf files (e.g., area value from ?h.area file). For each
> vertex, I want to determine the parcel it belongs to and its associated
> morphometric features. During this process, I exclude vertices labeled as
> ‘unknown’ or ‘medial wall’.
>
> In addition to the aparc parcellation, I am also using other parcellations
> computed on fsaverage. Therefore, I need to resample these parcellations
> onto native surfaces. To do this, I am using commands such as the one
> below:
>
>
>
> mri_surf2surf --srcsubject fsaverage \
> --sval-annot ${SUBJECTS_DIR}/fsaverage/label/lh.test\
> --trgsubject sub-test \
> --trgsurfval ${SUBJECTS_DIR}/sub-test/label/lh.test \
> --hemi lh
>
>
>
> As a sanity check, I used the above command to resample the aparc
> parcellation onto native surfaces (which is already done by recon-all).
> However, when I use the .annot files generated by the above command to
> extract morphometric features from surf files, I get a different number of
> vertices than when I use the .annot files generated by recon-all. Is this
> behavior expected? Am I doing something wrong?
>
> Thank you for your time and attention.
>
> Best,
>
> Leo
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Freesurfer mailing list
>
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>
> *MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from
> "secure-web.cisco.com" claiming to be*
> https://secure-web.cisco.com/1IAq-5SGA-W0qw5aaHaPMvuU_Fvw8foFkdrdco39XswlsTxWTrONRTRbkyRsEqH7YLQLsfDcst5tV3ztMKKTe_ZlPDAj3fFxAYFsIFYhuKGeLq10tmoTa2sn-JU5zPKng1K3ne2fcStYyYRI-7VENoiH_bBKYckRl8tiwfqROy47PGKGp668YrqI2Nix4jgsEUdFYyAsrsOlq1IXi991o5_9r85uF0H7ncj0wBvtvDGMfSWaKzB8vYvouCnBWdn6eDZTdXhX1Q4NrEV7ePx4bNr1e6XT-rUYFPR8g52inoOyZ_GZCYihm5tEQ47UFUkLQla7PjUR6YEA8suVRBlt6OQ/https%3A%2F%2Fmail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Ffreesurfer
>
> <https://secure-web.cisco.com/1KSZYX614qEx8hfwcMoajkL8do58-clrjyyKjwomQIwZordqlVUH_j9GvZhrYerbuYDuIH3jFfhKBtkUoV1nvJ9hEKX1Sg7rM4wZQZPGPPSU81wPwxt7aU17Wu378Tq__w1zreh76384bvc5AAWF1bXfhdCuw4XmOem-N1Kzax2E4MTsdsH49OKjuOc3V5OY70Gph6QPaBHDlBqK0hse-7g7mHxv_p1KUR2lD8Fn1g87i7UsAiiwukjJ7Iz-LB-j0NYseCuA2LRtmtFBesglG0g/https%3A%2F%2Fmail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Ffreesurfer>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://secure-web.cisco.com/1IAq-5SGA-W0qw5aaHaPMvuU_Fvw8foFkdrdco39XswlsTxWTrONRTRbkyRsEqH7YLQLsfDcst5tV3ztMKKTe_ZlPDAj3fFxAYFsIFYhuKGeLq10tmoTa2sn-JU5zPKng1K3ne2fcStYyYRI-7VENoiH_bBKYckRl8tiwfqROy47PGKGp668YrqI2Nix4jgsEUdFYyAsrsOlq1IXi991o5_9r85uF0H7ncj0wBvtvDGMfSWaKzB8vYvouCnBWdn6eDZTdXhX1Q4NrEV7ePx4bNr1e6XT-rUYFPR8g52inoOyZ_GZCYihm5tEQ47UFUkLQla7PjUR6YEA8suVRBlt6OQ/https%3A%2F%2Fmail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Ffreesurfer
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
> is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
> e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Mass General
> Brigham Compliance HelpLine at
> https://secure-web.cisco.com/1CA9K3JfPpK3GXgggqc2FeT4lpDWCHVYCjSa8cCcz-uZ_9rW7p7AdWJ0BSvJhFIur8AChWCWqN1SVTNg4_w8L3pD_ZmA42vsefxx7zg_9PXiaT63vaGVbklL3glbKL5zsgcbAUkhpSXmlWuMFoVJEfDvrHiy_N6OhaOdi6e7FkPgQl1m25ADLCUgS7GNL5XSNUwwfJZUtAB62xAaK9NonLNKXQDgM9XX0skyetRdOFvS62_rY6rjIybIMiOitVFQ9YWoQDi6uNFNLavXPqW1211HlfdIyHwLDSlWMwmV_UOuk8Ay1-tgRlkTFhw4f7RXiOpfk2OAJtzz6UMcE8kWBuQ/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.massgeneralbrigham.org%2Fcomplianceline
> <
> https://secure-web.cisco.com/1CA9K3JfPpK3GXgggqc2FeT4lpDWCHVYCjSa8cCcz-uZ_9rW7p7AdWJ0BSvJhFIur8AChWCWqN1SVTNg4_w8L3pD_ZmA42vsefxx7zg_9PXiaT63vaGVbklL3glbKL5zsgcbAUkhpSXmlWuMFoVJEfDvrHiy_N6OhaOdi6e7FkPgQl1m25ADLCUgS7GNL5XSNUwwfJZUtAB62xAaK9NonLNKXQDgM9XX0skyetRdOFvS62_rY6rjIybIMiOitVFQ9YWoQDi6uNFNLavXPqW1211HlfdIyHwLDSlWMwmV_UOuk8Ay1-tgRlkTFhw4f7RXiOpfk2OAJtzz6UMcE8kWBuQ/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.massgeneralbrigham.org%2Fcomplianceline>
> .
> Please note that this e-mail is not secure (encrypted). If you do not
> wish to continue communication over unencrypted e-mail, please notify the
> sender of this message immediately. Continuing to send or respond to
> e-mail after receiving this message means you understand and accept this
> risk and wish to continue to communicate over unencrypted e-mail.
>
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Please note that this e-mail is not secure (encrypted). If you do not wish to
continue communication over unencrypted e-mail, please notify the sender of
this message immediately. Continuing to send or respond to e-mail after
receiving this message means you understand and accept this risk and wish to
continue to communicate over unencrypted e-mail.
