External Email - Use Caution Which annot files are you comparing? Some of them (eg, aparc) have an extra procedure where the labels boundaries are fine-tuned, so that could cause the difference. Your command looks right.

On 8/30/2023 1:28 PM, Leonardo Cardoso Saraiva wrote:

        External Email - Use Caution

Dear Freesurfer Experts,

I would like to follow up on my last email and ask if you had a chance to take a look at it.

Any guidance or feedback would be greatly appreciated!

Thank you for your time!

Best,
Leo

Em dom., 20 de ago. de 2023 às 23:41, Leonardo Cardoso Saraiva <leonardo.sara...@usp.br> escreveu:

    Dear Freesurfer Experts,

    I am using .annot files to extract parcellated vertex-wise
    morphometric features from surf files (e.g., area value from
    ?h.area file). For each vertex, I want to determine the parcel it
    belongs to and its associated morphometric features. During this
    process, I exclude vertices labeled as ‘unknown’ or ‘medial wall’.

    In addition to the aparc parcellation, I am also using other
    parcellations computed on fsaverage. Therefore, I need to resample
    these parcellations onto native surfaces. To do this, I am using
    commands such as the one below:

    mri_surf2surf --srcsubject fsaverage \
               --sval-annot ${SUBJECTS_DIR}/fsaverage/label/lh.test\
               --trgsubject sub-test \
               --trgsurfval ${SUBJECTS_DIR}/sub-test/label/lh.test \
               --hemi lh

    As a sanity check, I used the above command to resample the aparc
    parcellation onto native surfaces (which is already done by
    recon-all). However, when I use the .annot files generated by the
    above command to extract morphometric features from surf files, I
    get a different number of vertices than when I use the .annot
    files generated by recon-all. Is this behavior expected? Am I
    doing something wrong?

    Thank you for your time and attention.

    Best,
    Leo


_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://secure-web.cisco.com/1KSZYX614qEx8hfwcMoajkL8do58-clrjyyKjwomQIwZordqlVUH_j9GvZhrYerbuYDuIH3jFfhKBtkUoV1nvJ9hEKX1Sg7rM4wZQZPGPPSU81wPwxt7aU17Wu378Tq__w1zreh76384bvc5AAWF1bXfhdCuw4XmOem-N1Kzax2E4MTsdsH49OKjuOc3V5OY70Gph6QPaBHDlBqK0hse-7g7mHxv_p1KUR2lD8Fn1g87i7UsAiiwukjJ7Iz-LB-j0NYseCuA2LRtmtFBesglG0g/https%3A%2F%2Fmail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Ffreesurfer
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is 
addressed.  If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail 
contains patient information, please contact the Mass General Brigham 
Compliance HelpLine at https://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline 
<https://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline> .
Please note that this e-mail is not secure (encrypted).  If you do not wish to 
continue communication over unencrypted e-mail, please notify the sender of 
this message immediately.  Continuing to send or respond to e-mail after 
receiving this message means you understand and accept this risk and wish to 
continue to communicate over unencrypted e-mail. 

Reply via email to