External Email - Use Caution        

Many thanks.
Best


On Tue, Jul 20, 2021, 14:36 Douglas N. Greve <dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:

> The two methods are totally different. See
> https://secure-web.cisco.com/1M9K3lSgALVk9H3YxzU4beySwAyD9LUr7aJIifLSz-a7CIwOjqchQeDJmULEhZQimw6d5hvIcBSQqZVqxAftbYdxFGAIr5X7PieRivW9QqQ-_ehTgwu5UEaxyyL6RNeh8hd-JqZFTCBQSuqgoVcUsARxUx3AczZ6LUu8DXczEvK3n1dpH4MnGMuqUTiQQqNdnQTfi0qXdkVLxXEGMob8dOqEgPceJ_C_gFx6b-zO8mJ4b6dyAU9WMgWiIjJfx9swlhLDYiocIISemxB8oV1Q8rw/https%3A%2F%2Fsurfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu%2Ffswiki%2FsbTIV
> the sb version actually performs a skull segmentation  and counts voxels
> within skull. The eTIV is computed from the talairach registration, which
> is going to be inherently more variable (eg, more or less neck will affect
> it).
>
> On 7/20/2021 3:24 PM, AJ wrote:
>
>         External Email - Use Caution
> Hi,
> I am looking at interscanner differences between Philip and GE.  I get
> significantly less variation between the scanners when looking at sbTIV
> (coefficient of variation < 1.5 %)  than  eTIV (12%) within subjects.   Any
> thought as to why?  Normalizing ROIs with sbTIV improves these differences
> even more.
>
> Thanks for your help.
>
> AJ
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing 
> listfreesur...@nmr.mgh.harvard.eduhttps://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://secure-web.cisco.com/1DDuQL9Kl6zOIpPWhQAXUSEacQhKZw8Sr9xZB53po8hkAxWnQBvoJ-V5QiJG4quxb2XjvnFhKn2MSRmPToiQ1JedrPt2NQ_icR4URDqeaj0nOfnW9h1xXllzTFRcCRDEFZ5i07k2ryqIjA4Ox_c_P3-gPGH42SZ8zp7qIYn21ZjpsLqwxGR-iZqwmMhw-zi1vN1oohOwj0XMyqF9eJd7iLodKNFFCc2IbO3BdUvZ2p8cD6G_2YAPSzykUPIlClQEmVgkU-SDREXPpw164Pl3Jdg/https%3A%2F%2Fmail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Ffreesurfer
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
> is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
> e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Mass General
> Brigham Compliance HelpLine at
> http://secure-web.cisco.com/15fQ02uIVGDHLLoPbHL29Ebc66_OWtqHdmJ8-A9X0uO9wG6fIcOF7HVIL_Yyk57OoXyINlKTheC6JNXlXC7nJHUDnd1HIFVM69Jr26quh8wNg-4Aeak0fRJWCCLO4urUsTd2eHV-AZ7DvrNFB9LHjI7KUdfJB-l9R51vvr1b933UOoWUsCrP22w5GkjDS4dsSYzhTPv0SVj_EuQ5qmHlFGtGfurmfV7KAmCmCeb9dma2tlVcOlXNVV1HwyW0Zbd0v-ncigYsoaTCckc5sP1PdZQ/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.massgeneralbrigham.org%2Fcomplianceline
>  . If the e-mail was sent
> to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact
> the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
> Please note that this e-mail is not secure (encrypted).  If you do not
> wish to continue communication over unencrypted e-mail, please notify the
> sender of this message immediately.  Continuing to send or respond to
> e-mail after receiving this message means you understand and accept this
> risk and wish to continue to communicate over unencrypted e-mail.
>
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Reply via email to