External Email - Use Caution Dear Eugenio and Philipp,
Thank you very much for your suggestions. Could you please give more input on "acquire the T1WI double and average it after coregistration, this increases the SNR". Should aquire twise the same sequence with 1x1x2 voxel dimension? Thanks Ramesh On Fri, 2 Apr, 2021, 9:00 PM Iglesias Gonzalez, Juan E., < [email protected]> wrote: > That all sounds right, thanks a lot Philipp! > > > > > > Juan Eugenio Iglesias > > Senior research fellow > > CMIC (UCL), MGH (HMS) and CSAIL (MIT) > > http://secure-web.cisco.com/1yAlNRge1To1jCEouu9JnBYJFnIJRo-86GCJ4EIWmAyj8pkkdBifGwyirgDc1KI-N6H7_dg4rBnLgE3CaKBeQuxL7GotNy9SzxKSD4OusIQrdGgcD_E0ObeWLPWYbYhFPgBDLEjcGPr-D8PT-k8bLD71quTve1q2fA_-MJY73fb-zPWX2QNDMT39_ceuRLWK8XGl18IGjSIXm6QeDK2erHCdQTO-rww0uRlSIph9mtjeVoEggFnM0sluSy0XceT-MPg9TJwCFg8RuNNq4J20pSw/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jeiglesias.com > > > > > > > > *From: *<[email protected]> on behalf of "Saemann, > Philipp" <[email protected]> > *Reply-To: *Freesurfer support list <[email protected]> > *Date: *Friday, April 2, 2021 at 03:51 > *To: *Freesurfer support list <[email protected]>, Umesh > Rurdrapatna <[email protected]> > *Subject: *Re: [Freesurfer] 2mm thick image for hippocampal segmentation. > > > > * External Email - Use Caution * > > Hi, > > > > I try to answer but Eugenio may also add comments. Several points that are > important: > > - 1.5 Tesla and 1x1x1 mm3 are at the limit of what the algorithm can > manage. > > - Post-aquisition reslicing to a higher resolution does not really > increase the information content. Internally the algorithm works at a much > higher resolution, anyway. > > - If possible, switch to 3 Tesla. > > - If possible and this is a prospective study, add a coronal T2 image and > use the bi-channel option. See papers of Iglesias et al. on this. > > - What you could also do on a 1.5 T is acquire the T1WI double and average > it after coregistration, this increases the SNR. > > - Generally, isometric resolutions are good due to the symmetry, of course. > > - Also on 1.5 T, you may go bit below 1 mm with good head immobilization, > and a longer scanning time. BRAVO in general is a good T1 option. > > > > Best, > > Philipp > > > ------------------------------ > > *Von:* [email protected] < > [email protected]> im Auftrag von Ramesh Babu < > [email protected]> > *Gesendet:* Freitag, 2. April 2021 09:29 > *An:* Freesurfer support list; Umesh Rurdrapatna > *Betreff:* Re: [Freesurfer] 2mm thick image for hippocampal segmentation. > > > > * External Email - Use Caution * > > Dear experts, > > Sorry for reposting. I am expecting some response from experts, so that I > can proceed with confidence. > > For our project work, we are looking for hippocampal and its > subfield volumes. Using GE 1.5T scanner, we tried a 3D BRAVO sequence with > 1x1x1 resolution, 256x256x160 dimension with 8* flip angle which produced > images with a lot of noise. Then we tried the same sequence with 1x1x2 > resolution, and 256x256x80 FOV, which produced a clean image without noise. > When we reformatted the images, it produces 0.5x0.5x1 resolution with > 512x512x172 dimension. > > > > Is this sequence good for hippocampal volume estimation and subfield > segmentation (also for whole-brain VBM analysis)? > > Could you please suggest to me a correct sequence, if need to be changed? > > > > Regards > > Ramesh > _______________________________________________ > Freesurfer mailing list > [email protected] > https://secure-web.cisco.com/1IXus-BXNwSxxsWt0Hl4GNJkM1JdHvv3SmnEoV0r7QyM62LQaQ7GOor7RtRN0aQzfhFM7lc_9Uu5fcLfv9rDBmaLelquFxD0i5EeJz7dRB1fSkcrH9OXh7CcxyQUdtB4YnGDLHG1bIPRqDN88-MQD4DLOCFxhRwE-yMzpgybXDc7HTRizMdSWlMKBuA-Ut2s6ZjmZ1o1v6hOcCdFt73IOXO-n12alCMDKQF2h4U1gnWzOiaxIt45LuwnOsHIljxgM20xQqjqxBim8X_oH_yng5Q/https%3A%2F%2Fmail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Ffreesurfer
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list [email protected] https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
