You could do it, but I would just use fsaverage. I don't understand
what the relationship would be between the number of vertices on the
surface and the number of voxels in the PET volume or the rational for
using the 5th order ico
On 2/12/2020 8:03 AM, Marina Fernández wrote:
External Email - Use Caution
Hi experts,
This is a question related to PetSurfer steps.
I would like to know if it is correct to sample the mgx volume onto
the surface of the average subject of my dataset (created with 5th
ordericosahedron tesselation) instead of the fsaverage (created with
7th ordericosahedron tesselation) or if there is any problem in the
next steps following this procedure.
We would like to do that because the volume PET resolution is more
proportional to this number of vertex (10242). Do you think it is correct?
Best wishes,
Marina.
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
