External Email - Use Caution
Dear Dr Greve,
Thank you so much for the response! Indeed, I used MRTM2 for HB pathological
regions and the results were very confusing.... Based on your response bellow,
I understand that for pathological regions I can feed "bp.nii.gz" files from
"MRTM1" not "MRTM2" to a surface based analyses. Is this correct?
Also for the flag "--km-ref", I have interest in doing whole brain
normalization (i.e. all ROIs in wmparc.mgz) in this case do I need to feed all
the numbers relevant to all ROIs in gtmseg.ctab. Is there any way to let
--km-ref know that I want to do whole brain normalization without feeding a
very long list of numbers?
Thank you so much for help
John
On 2/22/19 7:58 AM, john Anderson wrote:
External Email - Use Caution
Hi Dr Greve,
I would like to use petsurfet to do kinetic modeling (KM), the pipeline is
straightforward and easy to use. Thank you so much! I would appreciate any
clarifications relevant to my questions bellow:
1) I understand that the flag "--km-ref" define the reference region for
normalizing PET signal. in the linear below the reference region is cerebellum
cortex. If we need to normalize to occipital just we change the numbers based
on labels in aparc+aseg atlas?
Yes.
--km-ref 8 47 --km-hb 11 12 13 50 51 52 --no-rescale
2) --km-hb define the high binding regions. Are these regions represent the
regions that are pathologically involved where we expect it to have higher PET
signal OR it represent the regions where PET tracer has the maximum binding in
general regardless of pathology? I mean every tracer have high level in
specific regions in the brain is this what the flag is referring too?
I have not dealt with pathological cases with MRTM2. I would avoid using them
for the HB region as their kinetics may be different than healthy tissue.
Thanks for any clarification,
John_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
