External Email - Use Caution
Hi Dr. Greve,
I checked the lh.aparc.stats and rh.aparc.stats, the thicknesses (and the
other measures like volume and area) are all the same.
Thanks,
Jianzhong
Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. <dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu> 于2018年10月9日周二 上午10:16写道：
> The aseg.stats should be the same since that does not make reference to
> the surfaces. The aparc stats should have been different because the
> thickness should have been different. Can you check whether the thickness
> files are different?
>
> On 10/8/18 9:39 AM, Jianzhong Chen wrote:
>
> External Email - Use Caution
> Dear All,
>
> I tried recon-all with/without T2 image using FS 5.3.0. Then I found that
> the aseg stats and aparc stats with/without T2 are exactly the same. When I
> check the pial surfaces, I can see that they are very similar but not the
> same. So is it reasonable to see exactly the same stats?
> An example of the pial surfaces with/without T2 is attached here. The red
> line is lh.pial with T2 and the yellow line is the lh.pial without T2
> My command for recon-all with T2 is: recon-all -s ${subject} -i T1.nii
> -all -T2 T2.nii -T2pial -sd ${T2_dir}
> My command for recon-all without T2 is: recon-all -s ${subject} -i T1.nii
> -all -sd ${T1_dir}
>
> Thanks,
> Jianzhong
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing
> listfreesur...@nmr.mgh.harvard.eduhttps://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
