Hi Bruce,

    Thanks for your advice. There are a part of the result. Blue color stands 
women, and Red color stands men.
    The number of the data is not enough large. Are they ok? May I use them in 
my paper?




Thanks a lot !
Zheng








At 2017-11-20 10:15:49, "Bruce Fischl" <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
>Hi Zheng
>
>I would scatter plot age vs. volume, coloring men and women differently 
>(or different symbols) with and without eTIV correction to get an idea of 
>what is going on
>
>cheers
>Bruce
>
>
>On Mon, 20 Nov 
>2017, 郑凤莲 wrote:
>
>> Hi Bruce,
>>  
>>   My data is loss from 35 to 40. But the uniform of sex is not  well from 40 
>> to 55 and from 56 to
>> 71. I did the correlation analysis between age and volume. I don't know how 
>> I can explain this
>> problem. 
>>   Thanks again.
>> 
>> Sincerely,
>> Zheng  
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> At 2017-11-20 09:35:45, "Bruce Fischl" <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
>> >Hi Zheng
>> >
>> >how uniform is your distribution? I'm hardly an expert on this, but I 
>> >wouldn't expect very large effects until you get into the older end of 
>> >that range. Have you scatter plotted your data?
>> >Bruce
>> >On Mon, 20 Nov 2017, 郑凤莲 
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >> 
>> >> Hi Bruce,
>> >> 
>> >>     Thank you for your help.
>> >>     I have  54 subjects, aged from 21 to 71 and only one group. I want to 
>> >> compare the change of
>> >> hippocampus volume with age. The results before and after doing the 
>> >> correction for eTIV are the
>> >> same. Where is wrong? Or if there is no error, how can I explain it in 
>> >> discussion?
>> >> 
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Zheng
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> At 2017-11-20 04:55:49, "Bruce Fischl" <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
>> >> >Hi Zheng
>> >> >
>> >> >yes, I see. Maybe the effect is smaller than you have the power to see, 
>> >> >or 
>> >> >there is no effect? You would need to give us more details for us to 
>> >> >help. 
>> >> >Are you correcting for eTIV? What measure are you comparing?
>> >> >
>> >> >cheers
>> >> >Bruce
>> >> >  On Sun, 19 Nov 2017, 郑凤莲 wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Hi Bruce,
>> >> >> 
>> >> >>      I am sorry for this situation. 
>> >> >>      In the first way, there was an statistical difference in left 
>> >> >> hippocampus, but no differe
>> nce
>> >>  in
>> >> >> right hippocampus. In the second way, there was both no statistical 
>> >> >> difference in left or
>> >> >> right  hippocampus. I don't know what causes this result. 
>> >> >>      Can you understand me this time?
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> Thanks,
>> >> >> Zheng
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> At 2017-11-18 22:58:56, "Bruce Fischl" <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> 
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >Hi Zheng
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >no difference between what and what?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >cheers
>> >> >> >Bruce
>> >> >> >On Fri, 17 Nov 2017, 郑凤莲 wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> Hi professor,
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >>     I am using Freesurfer for DTI data. When I run 'mri_segstats', 
>> >> >> >> I 
>> >> >> >> got the result that there w
>> >> >> as
>> >> >> >> an obvious difference in left hippocampus, but no difference in 
>> >> >> >> right hippocampus. Then, I 
>> run
>> >> >> >> segmentation of hippocampus subfields. The result showed there is 
>> >> >> >> no difference in total le
>> ft 
>> >> or
>> >> >> >> right hippocampus, and only in two right hippocampus subfields has 
>> >> >> >> significant difference. 
>> Why
>> >>  is
>> >> >> >> there inconsistent result in two means? 
>> >> >> >>     Thank you very much.
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> Sincerely,
>> >> >> >> Zheng
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >>  
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> 
>> >> >>  
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> 
>> >> >>
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >>  
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> 
>>
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to