a) yes
b) yes, of course. We are always trying to improve things, so the new
versions are almost always a little different
cheers
Bruce
On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, Mehta,
Chintan wrote:
Dear FreeSurfer Users,
I have run recon-all on data using both FreeSurfer versions 5.3.0 and 6.0. FS
v6.0 generated files
named lh.aparc.pial.stats and lh.aparc.stats, whereas FS v5.3.0 created only
lh.aparc.stats. I
wanted to verify two things:
(a) Is it right that surface areas in lh.aparc.pial.stats correspond to pial
surface (boundary
between gray matter and CSF) of ROIs in the DK atlas, whereas lh.aparc.stats
contains surface area
at the boundary between gray matter and white matter at those ROIs?
(b) There were differences between the values in the lh.aparc.stats from FS 5.3
and FS 6.0, despite
my using the same data and same seed (i.e. -norandomness flag) for "recon -all"
under both versions.
Is it right that there are differences between the algorithms in FS 5.3 and FS
6.0 that could lead
to this?
Thank you.
Best,
Chintan
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.
