Dear FreeSurfer Users,
I have run recon-all on data using both FreeSurfer versions 5.3.0 and 6.0. FS v6.0 generated files named lh.aparc.pial.stats and lh.aparc.stats, whereas FS v5.3.0 created only lh.aparc.stats. I wanted to verify two things: (a) Is it right that surface areas in lh.aparc.pial.stats correspond to pial surface (boundary between gray matter and CSF) of ROIs in the DK atlas, whereas lh.aparc.stats contains surface area at the boundary between gray matter and white matter at those ROIs? (b) There were differences between the values in the lh.aparc.stats from FS 5.3 and FS 6.0, despite my using the same data and same seed (i.e. -norandomness flag) for "recon -all" under both versions. Is it right that there are differences between the algorithms in FS 5.3 and FS 6.0 that could lead to this? Thank you. Best, Chintan
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
