Dear FS team, I have two questions regarding manuel editing. We were looking at inter-rater reliability, but noticed it was not too high... However, during editing we used different criteria. Therefore I would like to ask:
1. Does the order of pial correction, topological deficit, wm corrections and control points editing matters? You seem to assume on your website for instance that pial corrections would come before wm corrections/control points, but is this necessarily the case? 2. When the wm intensity value is below 110, voxel inclusions might be needed. On the website is written: "when you feel like there is wm underneath you can add control points (...)". How to make a decision on this matter: based on sight or on wm intensity values? For instance, often the WM values are either 0 or 80 or above... Would it be good to assume that wm intensity values above 80 are actually wm, regardless of how it visually would look like? Likewise, would it be good to assume that areas where it says the wm intensity value is 0, that these areas are actually not wm, regardless of whether it might look like wm? So, basically, it is correct to make your decision only based on wm intensity values? Thank you for your reply. Kind regards, Caroline Beelen
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
