Hi Bruce,

Where may I find more information about the differences in recon-all or 
subcortical segmentations (aseg) between 5.3 and 6.0? 

Is the 6.0 pipeline still based on this paper?

Fischl, B., Salat, D. H., Busa, E., Albert, M., Dieterich, M., Haselgrove, C., 
… Dale, A. M. (2002). Whole brain segmentation: automated labeling of 
neuroanatomical structures in the human brain. Neuron, 33(3), 341–355. 


If not, could you please shed some light on the improvements in 6.0?

Thanks a lot.

S
-- 
Shane Schofield

On 27 February 2017 at 23:40:12, Bruce Fischl (fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu) 
wrote:

Hi weiwei 

if the aseg looks good you don't have to worry about how the subcortical 
structures look in the brainmask - it's irrelevant. Not sure about the pial 
surfaces - we find the surfaces in 6.0 more accurate than 5.3, but maybe 
not for your specific sequence? It's hard to say 

cheers 
Bruce 



On Mon, 27 Feb 2017, ? 
? wrote: 

> dear FS community: 
>     now i have more than 200 subjects which already finished recon-all with 
> 5.3, 
> since 6.0 released, i wonder should i re-run them with 6.0 as lots of changes 
> like 
> different surf-map and registration. i ran a bit of them as test and i found 
> the pial 
> problems were more than 5.3, and it seems some subcortical structures were 
> vanished 
> in the brainmask.mgz, though the aseg.mgz looked good. 
>     i wanna ask is my problem serious or it is usual with 6.0, and which 
> version you 
> think is better for cortical volume and surface thickness reserch? 
> best regards 
> 
> weiwei 
> west china hospital 
> 
> _____________________________________________________________________________________
>  
> weiqi77...@live.com 
> 
>_______________________________________________ 
Freesurfer mailing list 
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer 


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is 
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail 
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine 
at 
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error 
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and 
properly 
dispose of the e-mail. 
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to