Hi weiwei
if the aseg looks good you don't have to worry about how the subcortical
structures look in the brainmask - it's irrelevant. Not sure about the pial
surfaces - we find the surfaces in 6.0 more accurate than 5.3, but maybe
not for your specific sequence? It's hard to say
cheers
Bruce
On Mon, 27 Feb 2017, ?
? wrote:
dear FS community:
now i have more than 200 subjects which already finished recon-all with 5.3,
since 6.0 released, i wonder should i re-run them with 6.0 as lots of changes
like
different surf-map and registration. i ran a bit of them as test and i found
the pial
problems were more than 5.3, and it seems some subcortical structures were
vanished
in the brainmask.mgz, though the aseg.mgz looked good.
i wanna ask is my problem serious or it is usual with 6.0, and which
version you
think is better for cortical volume and surface thickness reserch?
best regards
weiwei
west china hospital
_____________________________________________________________________________________
weiqi77...@live.com
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.
