Dear Matthieu, your issue is discussed here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg51092.html and indirectly also here: http://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg51111.html I think that with V6.0 you maybe could get slightly better results (some bugs have been fixed and some tools improved), but definitelly it would require to re-inspect your data after reprocessing. Antonin Skoch Dear experts, Does anybody could answer my last request ?Best, Matthieu 2017-01-26 9:58 GMT+01:00 Matthieu Vanhoutte <matthieuvanhou...@gmail.com>: > Dear FS's experts, > > I have run all my cross with v5.3 and hesitate to run all longitudinal > process with v6. Does that make sense and will improve the process or would > it be risky to do this ? > > Many thanks for your lights ! > > Best regards, > Matthieu
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
