Thanks Bruce,
Much appreciated.
Cheers
Erik
________________________________________
From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu [freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] on behalf of Bruce Fischl [fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu]
Sent: 16 January 2017 15:41
To: Freesurfer support list
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] T2 voxel size needed for recon_all
Hi Erik
it's all empirical, but I would think much over 1.5mm in and direction
would make it of limited value
Bruce
On Mon, 16 Jan 2017, Erik O'Hanlon wrote:
> Dear Freesurfer experts,
>
> I'm wondering if there is a minimum voxel size for the T2 iamge to be
> included in the recon_all. My T1 is .9mm isotropic but the T2 available is
> 0.5mmx0.5mmx3mm. Would this voxel size offer any benefit or would it be best
> just to run the recon_all with only the T1 image.
>
> Thanks in advance and apologies for this basic question.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Erik
>
>
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.
Much appreciated.
Cheers
Erik
Erik O'Hanlon
Postdoctoral researcher
RCSI Psychiatry
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
Beaumont Road, Beaumont, D9, Ireland
T: 8093740
E: erikohan...@rcsi.ie W: www.rcsi.ie
RCSI DEVELOPING HEALTHCARE LEADERS
WHO MAKE A DIFFERENCE WORLDWIDE
________________________________________
From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu [freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] on behalf of Bruce Fischl [fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu]
Sent: 16 January 2017 15:41
To: Freesurfer support list
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] T2 voxel size needed for recon_all
Hi Erik
it's all empirical, but I would think much over 1.5mm in and direction
would make it of limited value
Bruce
On Mon, 16 Jan 2017, Erik O'Hanlon wrote:
> Dear Freesurfer experts,
>
> I'm wondering if there is a minimum voxel size for the T2 iamge to be
> included in the recon_all. My T1 is .9mm isotropic but the T2 available is
> 0.5mmx0.5mmx3mm. Would this voxel size offer any benefit or would it be best
> just to run the recon_all with only the T1 image.
>
> Thanks in advance and apologies for this basic question.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Erik
>
>
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
