yes, I believe so
Bruce
On Wed, 28 Sep 2016, Hanbyul Cho wrote:

Dear FreeSurfer Team,

I have an additional question about the ?h.sulc.

[mris_anatomical_stats can do this if you specify sulc as the
"thickness" file]

your explaination means that
instead of the
mris_anatomical_stats -l <specific label> -t lh.thickness -b -f <output
values> <subjects> lh

I can use these command with change the -t option:
mris_anatomical_stats -l <specific label> -t lh.sulc -b -f <output values>
<subjects> lh 

After then, 
at the output values the header 5. thickAvg (Average Thickness) value can
show an average of sulcal depth vector value.

Is it correct understanding?

I appreciate your detailed explanation.

Best Regards,

Han.




On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
wrote:
      1. It is the signed dot product of the movement vector with the
      outwards pointing surface normal of the white matter surface
      during inflation.

      2. Yes, because moving inwards for gyri the dot product is
      negative.

      3. Yes, I think so, although I'm not sure I understand.

      4. mris_anatomical_stats can do this if you specify sulc as the
      "thickness"
      file

       On Mon, 26 Sep 2016, Hanbyul Cho wrote:

            Dear FreeSurfer Team,

            I have questions about the sulcal depth.

            1) I heard that the output/surf/?h.sulc is showing
            the sulcal depth.
              Is it correct that the sulcal depth measure unit
            is normalized z-score, mm? And is
            it correct that the (-) values of sulcal depth mean
            gyral region (green), and (+)
            values mean sulcal region (red)?

            2) I wonder if ?h.sulc is based on white matter
            surface or pial matter surface.

            3) I analyzed the sulcal depth by vertex-level. if
            the results include the sulc (-)
            values region, Is it meaning that the gyral height?

            4) I wonder the method/commands for extracting the
            sulc value by label-level.

            5) Could you let me know the recommended smoothing
            option if it possible?  (e.g.
            --fwhm-trg [N])

            I appreciate your help.

            Thank you.

            Han Byul Cho


_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom
it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you
in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender
and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to