It does look better. Can you send me some more images--in axial and coronal planes?
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Ramtilak Gattu <ramtilak.ga...@wayne.edu> wrote: > > Thank you for recommending the expert options. I have run this on two > subjects (rows) and you can see the post analysis results on the right > (column) in the attached image . As you have mentioned it didnt work well > in the cerebellum any other ways to improve in the inferior regions? > > Thanks > > Regards > Tilak > ________________________________________ > From: Ramtilak Gattu > Sent: Monday, March 28, 2016 5:12 PM > To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] improving white/grey segmentation in recon -all > for better volume estmation > > Thank you, > > Attached is the scripts folder for one subject . > > Thanks > > Regards > Tilak > ________________________________________ > From: Ramtilak Gattu > Sent: Monday, March 28, 2016 4:11 PM > To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] improving white/grey segmentation in recon -all > for better volume estmation > > Sorry, Actually just found out that the receiving coil is the 12 channel > head coil and the transmitting coil is the body coil. I am attaching a > snapshot showing the sag orientation of the three cases that I previously > mentioned and uploaded for your review. > > >From these figures do you really think there is not enough contrast, just > wondering > > 1) why it worked in the bottom image and it failed in the upper two > (T1_sag_comparison.jpg) > 2) it failed in the left image and did good in the right image > (T1_sag_comparison_2.jpg). > > We have similar data in 25 of the subjects. Is there a way to salvage the > existing data and improve our results we will certainly follow your input > in changing the existing protocol and collect some data and run the > analysis to see if it improves the results. > > One more thought is if is there any other way around to increase the > contrast by taking help from T2 image and run recon-all. Do you think it > will help? > > Thanks for you help . > > Regards > Tilak > > ________________________________________ > From: Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> > Sent: Monday, March 28, 2016 11:22 AM > To: Ramtilak Gattu > Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] improving white/grey segmentation in recon -all > for better volume estmation > > what was the transmit coil? I think I would either reduce the voxel sizes a > bit or not use grappa. Probably go to 1.2 mm or so, which would be a 70% > increase in SNR. That won't help the transmit bias field though if you have > one. The 8 channel can also sometimes be a problem. The 32 channel coils > work much better > > On Mon, 28 Mar 2016, Ramtilak Gattu wrote: > > > Hey Bruce, > > > > The scans are done on 3T Siemens TRIO and 8 coil head channel with a > GRAPPA of 2. > > > > Here is the screen shot of protocol used. > > > > > https://waynestateprod-my.sharepoint.com/personal/ao3080_wayne_edu/_layouts/15/guestaccess.aspx?guestaccesstoken=VJ0QiLxUz9fI6GCUofGHq7IAQY6k4uG50U0ic0zBkHE%3d&docid=034b186e0a218401590414fc271f3cf5f > > > > Thanks > > > > Regards > > Tilak > > > > > > > > ________________________________________ > > From: Ramtilak Gattu > > Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2016 3:23 PM > > To: Bruce Fischl > > Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] improving white/grey segmentation in recon > -all for better volume estmation > > > > Hey Bruce, > > > > I have uploaded the files in > > > > > https://waynestateprod-my.sharepoint.com/personal/ao3080_wayne_edu/_layouts/15/guestaccess.aspx?guestaccesstoken=0MdoYLvWY2ZYOdi983YqZtMFGMns%2b5WB6dNeC3osudU%3d&docid=000b5dcba90f2419e9bdf4ce77dfd7a5e > > > > I have also included the 001.mgz in there. > > > > Thanks > > > > Regards > > Tilak > > > > ________________________________________ > > From: Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> > > Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2016 8:35 PM > > To: Ramtilak Gattu > > Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] improving white/grey segmentation in recon > -all for better volume estmation > > > > can you send me the rawavg.mgz from the subjects's mri file instead of > > these dicoms (which I can't read) > > On Sat, 26 Mar 2016, Ramtilak Gattu wrote: > > > >> > >> Hey Bruce, > >> > >> > >> Thanks for the quick reply. > >> > >> > >> I have uploaded the cases in > >> > >> > >> > https://waynestateprod-my.sharepoint.com/personal/ao3080_wayne_edu/_layouts/15/guestaccess.aspx?guestaccesstoken=%2bkyhy0gR4k7Q3AechqG%2bjqb89ALB94 > >> xWlpwBQnNAhG8%3d&docid=0a72431d82b4d4b9b924cccbdfb7f34f8 > >> > >> > >> The voxel dimensions are 1x1x1 mm. > >> > >> > >> > >> Thanks > >> > >> > >> Regards > >> > >> Tilak > >> > >> > >> > >> > ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ > >> From: Ramtilak Gattu > >> Sent: Friday, March 25, 2016 9:59 PM > >> To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > >> Cc: tilakga...@hotmail.com > >> Subject: improving white/grey segmentation in recon -all for better > volume estmation > >> > >> Hello all, > >> > >> > >> We have run recon -all on some healthy control subjects T1 images but > we found out that the gray-white segmentation on half our subjects is > >> bad and it leads to increased white matter volumes and decreased gray > matter volumes. I have included a snap shot showing the difference in > >> segmentation from bad to good for 3 cases > >> > >> > https://waynestateprod-my.sharepoint.com/personal/ao3080_wayne_edu/_layouts/15/guestaccess.aspx?guestaccesstoken=ajPIRobFq548RyhRJWPQ9q70vAXUGIJ9h5 > >> WPDE1klUw%3d&docid=0dd4546a8004f46578b7a2177b192806a > >> > >> . The parameter in the sequence are TE=4.92 ms, TR=19 ms, Flip angle > =20 degrees. and use a snapshot one slice to show the good CNR. We are > using > >> Freesurfer version 5.3. > >> > >> > >> Thanks > >> > >> > >> Regards > >> > >> Tilak. > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom > it is > > addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the > e-mail > > contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance > HelpLine at > > http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you > in error > > but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and > properly > > dispose of the e-mail. > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Freesurfer mailing list > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer > > > The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it > is > addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the > e-mail > contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance > HelpLine at > http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in > error > but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and > properly > dispose of the e-mail. > > -- Medical Director--Center for Neurologic Studies *43000 W. 9 Mile Road * *Novi, MI 48375* *CNS Phone (248)277-3334* *Cell: (248) 227-9814* *Fax (586) 566-0178* Web: www.NeurologicStudies.com <http://www.neurologicstudies.com/> -- ***NOTICE*** The documents accompanying this email transmission contain confidential information belonging to the sender, which is legally privileged. The information is intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity(ies) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this emailed information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify us by telephone at 248-277-3334 to arrange for return of the original documents to us. Thank you.
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
