Hi,

Thank you for your response. sorry, I could not understand what you mean.
How you found 23 230 60 values for paracentral region? I mean. Are these
from Freesurfer LUT?

Regards,
Faezeh Vedaei

On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 9:33 PM, Faeze Vedaei <faezeved...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thank you for your response. It is better to explain my question that the
> coordinates for paracentral in .ctab file is '63 100 60', that you changed
> these to '23 230 60' in your new version. My question is that how you
> applied such this change on the RBG values for this region?
>
> Regards,
> Faezeh
>
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 5:55 PM, Faeze Vedaei <faezeved...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thank you so much for you response. I should say that I know about what
>> you are saying. My issue is that I have these 4 columns in my LUT file. Why
>> and how can I change the numbers (RGB values) to create new LUT?
>>
>> Bests,
>> Faezeh
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 5:37 PM, Faeze Vedaei <faezeved...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Thank you so much for you descriptions. I checked out the link you just
>>> sent me. Because I do not have many experiences working with Freesurfer, I
>>> really could not understand about how I can do such this revising in LUT
>>> file. Can you explain more about this? I truly appreciate your time and
>>> help.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Faezeh Vedaei
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Faeze Vedaei <faezeved...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I really appreciate you for help me in this process. May you clarify me
>>>> from which pattern you changed the RGB values for that region? How I can
>>>> change the coordinates for the others?
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Faezeh Vedaei
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Faeze Vedaei <faezeved...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I should let you know that, it works! It shows paracentral name in
>>>>> tksurfer. So, how I have to revise my .ctab file to get the right result?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Faezeh Vedaei
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Faeze Vedaei <faezeved...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you for your response. I just used the command you suggested to
>>>>>> use by just a change in calling .ctab LUT file. I used the path:
>>>>>> 002_S_0413/labels/aparc.annot.a2009s.ctab because I could not work by 
>>>>>> just
>>>>>> calling aparc.annot.a2009s.ctab. It is strange that I created annot file
>>>>>> for lh.G_and_S_paracentral.label, but it shows its name in tksurfer:
>>>>>> G_and_S_frontomarg! I excluded the part --nhits too. So, what is your
>>>>>> opinion?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Faezeh Vedaei
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Faeze Vedaei <faezeved...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here is the text format of those files.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Faezeh Vedaei
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 5:30 PM, Faeze Vedaei <faezeved...@gmail.com
>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thank you so much for your response. I attached here three files
>>>>>>>> including the command lines, LUT file , and the list of names I want 
>>>>>>>> to get
>>>>>>>> and what the result is actually. I'd appreciate if you look at them 
>>>>>>>> and let
>>>>>>>> me know what is wrong with that.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>> Faezeh Vedaei
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Faeze Vedaei <
>>>>>>>> faezeved...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I checked again to arrange the labels in the order of LUT file,
>>>>>>>>> but the result has not changed. Can you help me more how I can fix 
>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>> problem? Thank you so much for your time and help.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>> Faezeh Vedaei
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 3:01 PM, Faeze Vedaei <
>>>>>>>>> faezeved...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thank you for your response. Yes, you are right. The names come
>>>>>>>>>> from the color LUT file. But, the issue is that I chose the label 
>>>>>>>>>> files
>>>>>>>>>> from that LUT file too. It meas the source that I chose the label 
>>>>>>>>>> files
>>>>>>>>>> from and the source of the region's names in tksurfer are the same. 
>>>>>>>>>> The
>>>>>>>>>> problem is just I do not have the label's names I merged to create 
>>>>>>>>>> annot
>>>>>>>>>> file, in the tksurfer GUI. It shows another names of that list! So, 
>>>>>>>>>> what do
>>>>>>>>>> you think about? What is the problem?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>> Faezeh Vedaei
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Faeze Vedaei <
>>>>>>>>>> faezeved...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Freesurfer experts,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I have created an annotation file by several label files using
>>>>>>>>>>> mris_label2annot command in Freesurfer. The problem is that when I 
>>>>>>>>>>> open
>>>>>>>>>>> this annot file in tksurfer and click on colored regions which 
>>>>>>>>>>> corresponded
>>>>>>>>>>> to specific labels I had chosen them, I do not have their name on 
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> vertex information part at the bottom of tksurfer GUI. It shows very
>>>>>>>>>>> different names for these regions. May you explains me what is the 
>>>>>>>>>>> problem
>>>>>>>>>>> I could not see the exact region's name as I have them for label 
>>>>>>>>>>> files?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>> Faezeh Vedaei
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to