Hi Kendrick
yes, we've played with different things for generating denser mesh
representation. Jon (ccd) I think is the expert. Or maybe I hope he is? I
can't remember the details, but hopefully he can
Bruce
On Sat, 17 Oct 2015,
Kendrick Kay wrote:
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 11:09:08 -0400 (EDT)
From: Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] recon-all pipeline for (sub-millimeter) 7T
data
To: Freesurfer support list <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Message-ID:
<alpine.lrh.2.20.1510171108090.29...@gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
High resolution fMRI has always been supported. V6 beta has better support
for high-resolution structurals. If your fMRI is higher than 1mm isotropic
then having higher res structurals (and hence denser cortical meshes)
might
be useful
Is there a way to obtain denser cortical meshes using the standard FreeSurfer
5.3.0
reconstruction pipeline with 1mm anatomical data? I looked for a flag, but
didn't find
one..
--
Kendrick Kay, PhD
Assistant Professor
Center for Magnetic Resonance Research
University of Minnesota, Twin Cities
Web: http://cvnlab.net
E-mail: k...@umn.edu
Cell: 510-206-1059
Skype: kendrickkay
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.
